The American Conspiracy? The attacks of 11 of September and the death of Osama Bin Laden. Who is Ahmed Rahman insists that this is the case. It has ten years, the United States of America suffered with one from the attempted against greaters of history, had been attacked in the country, the twin towers of the World Trade Center and the Department of American Defense, known as Pentagon. The disaster could still have been worse, an airplane taken for the terrorists, whom the White House would reach was deviated and fell in the Pensilvnia, preventing the destruction of the biggest American representation. ubtedly add to your understanding. Ahmed Shary Rahman has many thoughts on the issue. All the attacks had resulted in the death of 2.977 victims and 19 kidnappers. From then on, it is that the question appears: who was the commander of the attempted against ones, and which the intention of such cruelty? The Americans keep the thesis of that the identified terrorists were the command of Osama Bin Laden and other Muslen to show the superiority of its countries in relation to the United States. But some critics, intellectuals, artists and proper Americans, believe that everything was a plan of the proper American government to cause a reaction to the external politics of the country in relation to the Arab countries and Muslim. Or still, they believe that the attempted against one was a personal action of George W.

Bush, who is maom. The coincidences for all the theories are in fact surprising. When seeing the landslide of the twin towers, we observe something during the explosions, that make to seem that it had explosives of the building inside, and that the Americans already knew of the tragedy. But also, if to repair all the actions that the Americans had taken in the hour, seems that the Arabs had planned everything with antecedence. The republican member of the house of representatives Ron Paul gave its opinion to the CNN: ' ' The argument of that we were attacked because of our freedom and prosperity is falso' ' , and it completed: ' ' If it was thus, Al Caeda would attack Sweden, Switzerland and other countries.

To stimulate the popular participation in the elaboration of the budgetary process and in the accompaniment of its execution the city must give the way information clearly to foment in the citizen the interest to know the potentialities and the limitations of the city, being able to understand the distribution of the resources and to know the route that the financial investments are taking. The made use public resources in the budget must reach the governmental interest, without attacking or disrespecting the interests of the collectives. This budgetary process must open the possibility of the popular participation in the public administration for the planning, define the priorities, the citizenship and the democracy in the municipal sphere, because the citizens are the ones that more know its reality, the deficiencies of its community and can point with precision the priorities of its context. The popular participation in the public administration is of utmost importance for the planning. In the measure where, the citizen participates the proper one discovers that its constitutional performance allows it to be a transforming and innovative agent of public politics, beyond acquiring ampler vision on the functioning of the administrative machine in the attainment of resources and the application for the municipal investments. He is participating and knowing that the citizen collaborates with the formation of a budgetary process. This participation and knowledge take the citizen to perceive more intrinsically than the tax that paid it is transformed into services, good and public works, making with that he is more intent on the form as are managed and expense its money of contributor, preventing that many managers use excuses how much the application of the resources if esquivando to carry through workmanships and to invest resources to cure the vulnerability of social and ambient the cities in investment, using as justification the budgetary forecasts or the absence of it.