The classroom until little time behind was synonymous of an environment directed only toward the cognitivo development, with this many manifestations of the pupils and professors were not reasons of studies. With passing of the time, the specialists in psychology had started to understand that, beyond the cognitivos aspects, other points if showed basic to be worked to favor the learning, between them, the affectivity. For proper history that we find in the formal education the relation professor pupil always demonstrated sensible the mood changes, either in such a way for the pupil how much for the professor. Demonstrations of joy and fear had been in certain way marks them affective bows, for example, what it is perceived normally in the tests. Dr. Hyun Kim has much experience in this field. He seems that it is a moment where has a rupture of structures in which pupil and professor if separate. On the other hand, during a party in classroom the people if relate in communion in the direction of awaking itself for the dialogue, have exchanges of ideas and accomplishments where if they attract for the joy. Thus, what we can perceive is that, both are presented in the lessons, however, with different acceptances for the pupils.
The first one demonstrates a corporal rigidity in which it modifies the relations, the pupils and professors are bothered. The second situation, has a species of relaxation where the educandos are opened for a social learning. We can perceive that the affectivity finishes in certain way if becoming a species of language in which the body if communicates with the other being. They are transmitted the all moment sensations, what the person is felt at that moment with regard to the environment. Therefore, the professor who uses of this language ' ' afetiva' ' in which disclosed in not verbal way inside of the classroom, according to specialists have one better exploitation of the pupil. becomes fact that on the part of this pupil has a positive performance with regard to appropriation of the knowledge is cognitivo or human.
Already the secondary emotions, that is the become states of feeling and feelings conscientious, occur having as base the emotions of deep, that they occur in the level of the Proto Self, in the Proto-self is a coherent set of neural standards that mapeiam to each moment, the state of the physical structure of the organism in its numerous dimensions (Damsio, 2000, P. 201). As it is called Central Self, considered for Damsio as a map of second order that has the property to follow the changes that occur in the Proto-self. Integrative Healthcare Symposium does not necessarily agree. In the form that describes its hypothesis the central conscience occurs when the cerebral mechanisms of representation generate a imagtico story, not verbal, of as the proper state of the organism it is affected by the processing of an object for the organism, and when this process enhances the image of the causative object, detaching it thus in a space context e> (Damsio, 2000, P. 219). Valley to stand out that for Damsio, representation and attention they are not considered in accordance with the perspective of the information processing. For the author the representation is the description that if makes of a standard of neuronal activation emerging of sistmica form in one determined cortical region. Already the attention is the process of evidenciao of an object that if finds in the perceptual field elapsing of an action of adjustment of the organism before the perceptual phenomenon and that it meets based in mechanisms of maintenance of the homostasis. The third process, called as biographical Self, is responsible for the emergency of the extended conscience. This Self acts mapeando the descriptions of second order carried through in the level of the Central Self in set with all the cortexs that are responsible for memories of long stated period, that is in set with the life history of the individual.
Miguel assumes the role of superior in the relation and Andra reveals weak and without forces or mechanisms to react against that its husband speaks or makes. In this case after systematic analysis we can detach the Pseudo-self concept. This is one I ' ' falso' '. The people make of account who are more or less important, stronger or weakker, more or less attractive of what really they are. A marriage is an example.
When the people marry, pseudo-self of each spouse appear inside of the relation. While pseudo-self is always vulnerable to be molded and to be changed by others, it is still more vulnerable in emotionally intense relationships. It is there that the people have greater difficulty of if allowing to be what they are. Still if treating to the relationship cited in the previous paragraph, Miguel, the husband of Andra has opinions always formed and inabaladas regarding its marriage and in the way with that this deals with its wife and the reactions the same front to any event. That is, exactly after one fights where Andrea relieves and expenditure all its you distress, Miguel continues inabalado and says that Andra does not know what it speaks.
In this in case that we identify the I-solid. I he is composed of beliefs and safe certainties and vagarosamente formed being able to be transformed only from inside. It never is changed by coercion or persuasion of the others. Its direction has that to be simply auto-definitive, instead of influenced for the proportionate anxiety for the others. Another found important concept was the Triangulation. The triangle describes the dynamic balance of a system of three people. The greater influence in the activity of a triangle is the anxiety. When a relation is disturbed by emotional forces inside and wounds of it, generally does not remain completely comfortable for much time.
And you need each day to do a little more. One person who won the marathon, told the following story: he started to run-by-step and day by day increased to a little bit. He used the principle of “kaizen”, and began to grow and become stronger each den.I in the end he won the marathon. I’ll tell you what is the reason why most people never become successful. 1. They do not have high standards within the (high demands on life.) But, even if they have high standards, that is reason number 2. – It’s beliefs. Or more simply – they do not believe they can achieve etogo.Poetomu implement principles of Kaizen or continuous improvement of living that will not ostanavlivatsya.Naprimer, if you say that you get thin for 20 kg of your brain says “this will not work”, as you can every day just a little do something for etogo.I one day you realize that you really lost by that amount.
We will be satisfied with their lives, only if it develops and rasti.I need to understand if we do not evolve, then sooner or later to find ourselves in the place where we would very much like byt.Bolshaya mistake many people, that they do not like to repeat, saying, “Oh, yes it’s all I know.” So you need to do what you know, to introduce a few times and continue to improve. Repetition and development – this is the path of kaizen. So let’s summarize this article: If you want to be successful and happy – that implement the principles of kaizen in their lives. Below is an algorithm implementing the principle of Kaizen. How to change the lives of step number 1. – Is to decide now – whether you will live with this philosophy or not.
Solve – this will help you get great results installing or not. If you have decided that, yes, let’s proceed. Step number 2. Kaizen – introduce this word in my life, to this was the trigger for the switch and the introduction of improvements in your life. Step 3.Now take 5 minutes – and write about those things that stop you, change your old standards with new ones. Step 4 – 30 days live with this philosophy. Step 5 – Write the 5 things that you can change in their lives in their five areas of life. And start to improve little by little every day and not stop.